|
Oral Neoplasia
The saying among pathologists - "nothing good ever grows in the
mouth of dogs or cats" - is more than just a reflection of our normal,
gloomy perspective on life! Depending on the study, 75-90% of oral tumors
in dogs (excluding gingival epulides) are melanomas, squamous cell carcinomas
or fibrosarcomas. In cats, 60-75% are squamous cell carcinomas and most
of the rest are fibrosarcomas. While there is some difference in behavior
and therapeutic response depending on the specific tumor and its location,
oral tumors in both species are locally invasive and osteolytic, have a
very high frequency of local recurrence, and an almost equally high prevalence
of eventual metastasis to local lymph node and to lung (unless we intervene
with euthanasia). This dismal prognosis can be improved considerably, particularly
in terms of the rapidity of local recurrence, by radical surgical excision,
and/or by the use of radiation therapy.
Prognostic data for the various tumors are presented on the next page.
A word of warning: these data are highly biased by the timing of diagnosis.
Most come from referral institutions and thus reflect the post-surgical
survival times for relatively advanced disease. With the growing popularity
of dental examination, I suspect that we will be detecting these tumors
much earlier. This may not reduce the eventual case fatality rate, but
it should result in a much longer interval between surgery and euthanasia.
Whether it will improve the cure rate or not is harder to predict.
What about adjunct therapies?
Based on available data, these are palliative rather than curative.
About 80% of canine oral melanomas respond to a high dose radiation fractionated
over three doses (days 0,7,21). In about half the cases, the oral tumor
completely disappears but the prevalence of fatal distant metastasis is
not affected. Even though eventual case fatality rates probably remain
the same, the quality of life is greatly improved and the need for premature
euthanasia because of locally destructive growth is greatly reduced. Irradiation
of feline oral squamous cell carcinomas increases median survival time
from 3-6 months to 12-14 months but does not result in cure.
Are there any "good" oral tumors?
Exophytic nodular growths along the gingiva usually are foci of gingival
hyperplasia or one-type-or- another of epulis. Even though one type of
epulis - acanthomatous epulis - requires fairly aggressive resection to
ensure cure, none are life threatening.
Granular cell tumors are smooth nodular growths that bulge from the
surface of the canine tongue. Their cell of origin remains controversial
but at least some originate from Schwann cells of peripheral nerve. They
are cured by excision and have no metastatic potential.
Plasmacytomas occur in mouth as yet another of their unusual site predilections
that include ear canal, larynx, toe, prepuce and rectum! Although a few
will recur because of initially incomplete excision in this difficult operative
environment, they have no metastatic potential.
Squamous cell carcinomas are probably more manageable than the other
oral malignancies, especially if detected early. Early tumors may not look
proliferative: my records are full of mildly osteolytic lesions of tooth
sockets or subgingival bone, or of non-healing sublingual ulcers in cats,
that are identified on biopsy as squamous cell carcinomas. Many are well
differentiated tumors that seem to progress only slowly, so early surgical
intervention may offer a good chance for complete cure. The prospects for
cure look better for dogs than for cats. As usual, the feline tumors seem
inherently more aggressive despite a histologic appearance that is virtually
identical to that of dogs. Part of the dismal prognosis relates to anatomy
(you can't amputate much from a cat's tongue!), but there also seems to
be a fundamental species difference. Those from the maxilla are particularly
nasty, and a one-year survival with even the most determined therapy is
the best you can offer. We may discover some new magic bullet, but realistic
pessimism seems to be the watchword for now.
The tables below are summaries of available data; results from similar
studies have been combined for ease of presentation. Please note the very
small numbers under some headings, which make definitive prognosis virtually
impossible.
PREVALENCE OF ORAL NEOPLASIA IN DOGS AND CATS IN ONTARIO*
|
| Species |
Squamous cell carcinoma (%) |
Melanoma (%) |
Fibrosarcoma (%) |
| Dog |
28 |
22 |
4 |
| Cat |
84 |
0 |
10 |
|
| * HISTOVET data, 820 cases. |
POSTOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR OF GINGIVAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAS IN DOGS
|
| Procedure |
No.
|
Recurrence
|
Survival
|
|
|
Local
(%)
|
Distant
(%)
|
1 yr.
(%)
|
Median
(mos.)
|
| Local excision1 |
8
|
?
|
?
|
40
|
9
|
| Partial mandibulectomy2,3 |
43
|
7
|
11
|
88
|
26
|
| Partial maxillectomy4 |
7
|
29
|
0
|
57
|
19
|
|
POSTOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR OF TONSILLAR SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAS IN DOGS
|
| Procedure |
No.
|
Recurrence
|
Survival
|
|
|
(%)
|
1 yr.
(%)
|
Median
(mos.)
|
| Tonsillectomy1,5 |
24
|
100
|
0
|
2
|
|
POSTOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR OF ORAL MELANOMAS IN DOGS
|
| Procedure |
No.
|
Recurrence
|
Survival
|
|
|
Local
(%)
|
Distant
(%)
|
1 yr.
(%)
|
Median
(mos.)
|
| Partial mandibulectomy2,3,6 |
50
|
17
|
>80
|
19
|
9
|
| Partial maxillectomy4,7 |
37
|
35
|
>80
|
36
|
8
|
|
POSTOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR OF ORAL FIBROSARCOMAS IN DOGS
|
| Procedure |
No.
|
Recurrence
|
Survival
|
|
|
Local
(%)
|
Distant
(%)
|
1 yr.
(%)
|
Median
(mos.)
|
| Local excision1 |
6
|
?
|
35
|
33
|
1
|
| Partial mandibulectomy2,4,6 |
47
|
52
|
16
|
29
|
10
|
| Partial maxillectomy3,4,7,8 |
36
|
50
|
15
|
50
|
10
|
|
POSTOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR OF GINGIVAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAS IN CATS*
|
| Procedure |
No.
|
Recurrence
|
Survival
|
|
|
Local
(%)
|
Distant
(%)
|
1 yr.
(%)
|
Median
(mos.)
|
| Partial mandibulectomy or maxillectomy9,10 |
10
|
90
|
8
|
10
|
6
|
|
| * prognosis for sublingual SCC appears to be even worse. |
|
|
|
|
|
References:
- Todoroff, R.J. and Brodey, R.S., Oral and pharyngeal neoplasia in the
dog: a retrospective survey of 361 cases. J Amer Vet Med Assoc 175:
567-571, 1979.
- Kosovsky, J.K., Matthiesen, D.T., Marretta, S.M. and Patnaik, A.K.,
Results of partial mandibulectomy for the treatment of oral tumors in 142
dogs. Vet Surg 20, 6: 397-401, 1991.
- White, R.A.S., Mandibulectomy and maxillectomy in the dog: long term
survival in 100 cases. J Small Anim Prac 32: 69-74, 1991.
- Wallace, J. and Matthiesen, D.T., Hemimaxillectomy for the treatment
of oral tumors in 69 dogs. Vet Surg 21, 5: 337-341, 1992.
- Vos, J.H. and Van Der Gaag, I., Canine and feline oral pharyngeal tumors.
J Vet Med 34: 420-427, 1987.
- Schwarz, P.D., Withrow, S.J., Curtis, C.R., Powers, B.E. and Straw,
R.C., Mandibular resection as a treatment for oral cancer in 81 dogs. J
Amer Anim Hosp Assoc 27: 601-610, 1991.
- Schwarz, P.D., Withrow, S.J., Curtis, C.R., Powers, B.E. and Straw,
R.C., Partial maxillary resection as a treatment for oral cancer in 61
dogs. J Amer Animal Hosp Assoc 27: 617-624, 1991.
- Salisbury, K.S., Richardson, D.C. and Lantz, G.C., Partial maxillectomy
and premaxillectomy in the treatment of oral neoplasia in the dog and cat.
Vet Surg 15, 1: 16-26, 1986.
- Bradley, R.L., MacEwen, E.G. and Loar, A.S., Mandibular resection for
removal of oral tumors in 30 dogs and six cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc
184: 460-463, 1984.
- Bradley, R.L., Sponenberg, D.P. and Martin, R.A., Oral neoplasia in
15 dogs and 4 cats. Small Anim Vet Med Surg 1: 33-42, 1986.
Brian Wilcock, D.V.M., PhD.
21 Vardon Drive, Guelph, Ont. N1G 1W8
Toll Free Phone/Fax: 1-800-853-PATH
Outside Canada: 519-822-4486
Fall 1995
|